Agentic finance · Fifth Order
Financial Workflows Benchmark
Models complete multi-step financial workflows: gathering evidence, interpreting statements and turning analysis into a usable answer. Evaluation considers whether the requested work is completed, calculations reconcile and conclusions remain supported by the available information. The score summarizes task performance on a 0–100 scale; higher values indicate stronger completion across the workflow collection.
Model results
38 configurationsRankModelScore
- 188.2%
Grok 4.6 xHigh reasoning
- 287.2%
GPT 5.6 Luna Max reasoning
- 382.2%
GLM 5.3 Max reasoning
- 481.2%
DeepSeek V4 Flash Max reasoning
- 577.2%
Claude Fable 5.1 Adaptive/Max
- 676.2%
GPT 6 Luna Max reasoning
- 775.2%
Muse Glimmer 30B xHigh reasoning
- 871.2%
Claude Opus 5 Adaptive/Max
- 970.2%
Gemini 3.8 Flash High reasoning
- 1065.2%
GPT 5.6 Sol Max reasoning
- 1164.2%
Hy3 High reasoning
- 1260.2%
GPT 6 Astra Max reasoning
- 1359.2%
Muse Spark 1.2 xHigh reasoning
- 1458.2%
Mistral Large 3 Not specified by publisher
- 1554.2%
Grok 4.7 xHigh reasoning
- 1653.2%
Claude Sonnet 5 Adaptive/Max
- 1748.2%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max reasoning
- 18◇Beam 1.0 Max reasoning47.2%
- 1943.2%
Muse Wonder 1.0 Max reasoning
- 2042.2%
GLM 5.3 Flash Max reasoning
- 2141.2%
Kimi K2.7 Code Max reasoning
- 2237.2%
Muse Spark 1.3 Max reasoning
- 2336.2%
Mistral Large 4 High reasoning
- 2431.2%
Claude Fable 5 Adaptive/Max
- 2530.2%
GPT 5.6 Terra xHigh reasoning
- 2626.2%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Adaptive/Max
- 2725.2%
Qwen 3.8 Max xHigh reasoning
- 28◇Inkling Max reasoning24.2%
- 2920.2%
Gemini 4 Argon High reasoning
- 3019.2%
Gemini 3.7 Flash High reasoning
- 3114.2%
GPT 6 Sol Max reasoning
- 3213.2%
DeepSeek V4 Pro Max reasoning
- 339.2%
Claude Opus 5.5 Adaptive/Max
- 348.2%
Hy4 Preview High reasoning
- 357.2%
Gemini 3.1 Pro High reasoning
- 363.2%
GPT 6.1 Sol Max reasoning
- 372.2%
Kimi K3 Max reasoning
- 381.2%
Nemotron 3 Ultra Not specified by publisher
Numeric table · 38 configurations
| Rank | Model / setting | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88.2% | |
| 2 | 87.2% | |
| 3 | 82.2% | |
| 4 | 81.2% | |
| 5 | 77.2% | |
| 6 | 76.2% | |
| 7 | 75.2% | |
| 8 | 71.2% | |
| 9 | 70.2% | |
| 10 | 65.2% | |
| 11 | 64.2% | |
| 12 | 60.2% | |
| 13 | 59.2% | |
| 14 | 58.2% | |
| 15 | 54.2% | |
| 16 | 53.2% | |
| 17 | 48.2% | |
| 18 | ◇Beam 1.0 Max reasoning | 47.2% |
| 19 | 43.2% | |
| 20 | 42.2% | |
| 21 | 41.2% | |
| 22 | 37.2% | |
| 23 | 36.2% | |
| 24 | 31.2% | |
| 25 | 30.2% | |
| 26 | 26.2% | |
| 27 | 25.2% | |
| 28 | ◇Inkling Max reasoning | 24.2% |
| 29 | 20.2% | |
| 30 | 19.2% | |
| 31 | 14.2% | |
| 32 | 13.2% | |
| 33 | 9.2% | |
| 34 | 8.2% | |
| 35 | 7.2% | |
| 36 | 3.2% | |
| 37 | 2.2% | |
| 38 | 1.2% |
Methodology
Performance is scored on a 0–100 scale across retrieval, calculation, synthesis and judgment. Higher scores rank first; equal scores share a rank.
